Review Guidelines

Quality Assurance & Integrity Framework

The EPH - International Journal of Biological & Pharmaceutical Science (IJBPS) is profoundly grateful for the dedication and expertise provided by our global network of reviewers. Peer review is an essential service that maintains the quality of the scientific record. To ensure every manuscript is judged solely on its scientific contribution, we employ a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review System.

The Double-Blind Advantage

By ensuring the identities of both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, we eliminate potential biases associated with gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation. This ensures the focus remains exclusively on the methodology, data, and pharmaceutical significance of the research.

1. Preliminary Review

Initial screening verifies scope relevance and ethical compliance. Only manuscripts meeting baseline standards for originality proceed to formal evaluation.

2. Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers scrutinize methodological rigor and reproducibility. Premium is placed on clarity and the work's potential to advance pharmaceutical knowledge.

3. Ethical Safeguards

Reviewers are bound by strict confidentiality. IJBPS actively guards against duplicate submission and unethical research practices.

4. Editorial Outcomes

ACCEPT | MINOR REVISION | MAJOR REVISION | REJECT

✓

Final Publication Authority

While peer reviewers provide vital expertise, the final decision rests exclusively with the Editor-in-Chief. This ensures a consistent standard of excellence and adherence to international scholarly regulations.